MUC and Derby don't match...
I am sorry to say this. We have found a bug in the MUC component which breaks it for the Derby database. So at the moment MUC component won't work on installations using Derby database. A fix is already ready and will be released later today. I am sorry for all the inconvenience.
35, kobit//tigase.org, 2008-11-13 12:19
The first bug report for the new release...
Just received the first bug report:
#99. If anybody else experienced problems like this please send me the report immediately. Ideally with as much information as possible. Have a look at the comments to this ticket for details what information are useful to me. And also please send me your contact info so I could respond directly.
34, kobit//tigase.org, 2008-11-13 10:31
300 page views in an hour!
New version of the Tigase server has been released. Article published and within an hour the article read counter turned 300 views...
33, kobit//tigase.org, 2008-11-12 22:16
XMPP/Jabber service restarts
We are planing the XMPP server upgare works in coming days to the most recent version. Therefore please be adviced there might be service disruptions in coming days.
32, kobit//tigase.org, 2008-10-03 13:57
Minis from XMPP are back
Due to a significant code rework and changes in many places of the Tigase server short-news were temporarly not working.
This was mainly related to clustering implementation in the Tigase server and need for major code cleanup. The implementation has been finished and slowly all parts of the system are back....
31, kobit//tigase.org, 2008-07-02 10:27
Yes this is right place to discuss a potential bugs or even anything related to Tigase server.
What you are describing above is not a bug. It's a feature. I mean this behavior conforms XMPP RFC document: Integration of Roster Items and Presence Subscriptions. There is nothing in RFC which would suggest that server should push presence with subscribe every time user connects to the server.
I mean if the target user is off-line Tigase will deliver subscription request when user B login next time. But only once.
On the other hand however, behavior you described also does make sense.
I will contact EJabberd developers and Openfire developers to find out if their implementation follows any guidelines or Jabber extension. As behavior described by you is not a standard thing I would prefer to do it the same way as others to make it more compatible with the rest of Jabber world.
Please let me know if it didn't answer your question.